THE ATLANTIC: Does the GOP Have a Tea Party Problem?

March 27, 2010

By Chris Good

A question hovering around the tea party movement has been: will it hurt Republicans at the polls in November, generating third-party candidates and sucking votes away from the GOP?

Polling released this past week by Quinnipiac says this is a possibility: with tea party candidates running in a generic race, Republicans go from winners to losers, with just 25% of the vote. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, for its part, has put together a list of races involving conservative challengers, some running as third-party candidates, advertised as “Palin’s Primaries.”

I don’t know the answer to this question for sure, but I do know this: top tea party organizers are not interested in supporting third-party candidates, or in forming official Tea Party political parties in states, which means it’s unlikely we’ll see an organized movement to form Tea Parties and make trouble in GOP-stronghold districts.

In other words: the tea party movement won’t rise up to challenge the GOP, on a national scale, any time soon.

“Personally, I think it’s better to run within the established parties and try to change the parties,” said Jenny Beth Martin, national co-chair of the group Tea Party Patriots. Martin’s group claims to have 15 million members; after surveying local organizers, Tea Party Patriots leaders put out a statement making clear that it did not support the formation of a Tea Party political party.

With guidance from the Dick Armey-led FreedomWorks, the tea party movement figures to target, in organized fashion, about four House races and four Senate races this fall. None of those include third-party bids.

As far as third-party candidates go, it’s more likely that individuals will decide to run, without the encouragement of state or national organizers, seeking to claim the tea party mantle.

But it’s questionable whether such candidates would garner enough support to make a difference, despite the findings from Quinnipiac. It’s one thing to tell a pollster you like the idea of a tea party candidate–and, to be sure, some conservatives are upset with the Republican Party, based on TARP and Bush-era spending–but another thing to vote for a candidate who is polling low, especially if a Republican candidate has tacked sufficiently to the right.

We saw a tea partier run in the Massachusetts Senate race, but Joe Kennedy (no relation to the Kennedy family, or to the other Joe Kennedy) only got 1% of the vote.

Continue reading at The Atlantic


Related posts:

  1. THE ATLANTIC: House GOP’s New Contract is a Page From the Tea Party
  2. WSJ: “Tea-Party Activists Stage Tax-Day Rallies”
  3. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR: GOP Leaders Want their Money Back from Charlie Crist
  4. WEEKLY STANDARD: Grand Old Tea Party – The insurgents meet the insiders.
  5. CONGRESS.ORG: Tea Partier to GOP… “Copy Away”

{ 4 comments }

Reimagineer March 28, 2010 at 5:05 am

The Tea Party and others that were perplexed, angered, and generally ticked off by the Healthcare Reform-atory Congress and the President have put us in need to get it! The ONLY real FREE MARKET, FEDERALIST, CAPITALISM, and AMERICAN CITIZEN based Nat’l Health initiative has been developed and now needs to be adopted so each of us CAN own our own healthcare without Federal intervention or gatekeeping…..get it free at http://www.careinhealthcare.com and become a leader in the push to repeal WITH a viable option to care!!!

CJ March 28, 2010 at 12:05 pm

Joe Kenneday was not a TEa party candidate. He was a libertarian who pretty much sounded like Coakley jr. That is why he got 1% of the vote.

Please get your facts straight. We are working hard for candidate who are bucking the system and making sence.

Pro-Life April 1, 2010 at 8:40 pm

This ‘Contract From America’ seems like more of the GOP. I will not vote

for the lessor of evils. Socialism is collective theft. Abortion is murder. Unjust

war is murder. Federal Reserve Notes are counterfeit money. The GOP is

part of the problem, because it demands compromise of truth, so as to win.

We are on the brink of destruction because of compromise and you are

asking for more of the same.

Daniel April 4, 2010 at 1:50 am

I want our government to stick with it’ real work of takeing care of us not where it seems to be going , which is broke. I hope that this citizens movement will cause the elected representitives to consider their work and how it affects the general welfare. If they must be voted out to change bad policy ok but it would be better for them to undestand our concerns and work for us on better policy.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: